Search for: "U.S. v. Cohen (2 Cases)"
Results 101 - 120
of 484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2017, 10:45 am
In an interesting examination of the role of social media platforms and terrorism, the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
The one case citation I left in, above, is Cohen v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 523 (2002), the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:52 am
Cohen, Deputy Administrator, U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Whiddon, et al., 2:13-cv-192-FtM-29CM (M.D. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:02 am
Griffin, 241 U.S. 6, 14 (1916).[13] Messina v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
U.S. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:44 am
R., Cohen, L., Taube, R. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Jan. 13, 2012); Cohen v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
The constitutionality of § 2(a) is now in question because of some high-profile cases. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
The qui tam case is captioned U.S. ex rel. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In that case, a handful of U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:03 am
Holder Rehearing Denied Cohen on Flynn v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 12:06 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm
Ag Pro, Inc., 425 U.S. 273 (1976); Anderson’s-Black Rock, Inc. v. [read post]
