Search for: "U.S. v. Gill" Results 101 - 120 of 334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 8:31 am by John Elwood
Will Benisek become a legal Sharknado by combining two killer themes in one case, or will it wind up as a “hold” for Gill v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
About $4,300, so far” [John Beauge, PennLive] On Gill v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Sarah Grant summarized Stephen Gill’s tort claims against the U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:17 am by Nate Nead
As of 2012, consumers 65 and older accounted for 36 percent of U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Sarah Grant
Add one more to the tally of collateral proceedings arising out of United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quomodocumque, mathematician Jordan Ellenberg takes issue with a claim made at oral argument on behalf of the state of Wisconsin in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law.com (subscription or registration required), Marcia Coyle reports that “[t]he U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Whether it can do so is a key issue in the current case, Gill v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman and Lark Turner note that the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Journal Sentinel, Paul Jossey observes that “[i]n the Supreme Court’s closely watched redistricting case, [Gill v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse suggests that the worries Chief Justice John Roberts expressed at the oral argument in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy stresses the importance of Gill v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that Chief Justice John Roberts has met with criticism for suggesting during the oral argument in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]