Search for: "U.S. v. Penta*"
Results 101 - 120
of 726
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Politico writes that Austin has experience overseeing a theatre of operations and running U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 5:33 am
On Nov. 9, U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Trump supporting the killer of two people in Kenosha, and refusing to allow Confederate generals’ names to be removed from U.S. military bases? [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 1:48 pm
After the U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
LGBTQ communities have grown so large and robust, and there are so many places in the U.S. where many of them can thrive, that it’s possible to forget that almost all of these judicial victories are profoundly controversial. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 1:29 pm
The U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
Under the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
He did, however, deploy the U.S. military in Washington, D.C. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:07 pm
Relatedly, the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:08 am
In fact, U.S. government federal agencies have a very specific answer. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
So today my remarks will focus on war powers—specifically the president’s ability to commit the U.S. armed forces into some level of hostilities without congressional authorization. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm
Audrey Kurth Cronin argued that the killing of Qassem Soleimani erodes the norm against assassination in a way that is ultimately counter to U.S. interests. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
Under well-established principles underlying the U.S. judicial system, by analogy, a motion to dismiss should address only questions of law, not questions of fact—in this case, the question of whether the actions the president is alleged to have committed rise to the level of a high crime and misdemeanor. [read post]
