Search for: "US v. Stallings" Results 101 - 120 of 950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2015, 5:49 am
A bunch of horse-feathers if you ask us. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 2:53 pm by Lubiner & Schmidt, LLC
Recently, the Supreme Court decided to hear the case, captioned Texas v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting and influential passage, most recently quoted by Judge Posner in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:57 pm by Melinda Deel
The second independent semi-annual monitoring report to Judge Nancy Edmunds pursuant to the 2008 settlement in Dwayne B. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 7:59 am by Unknown
Attorney Damian Williams last week said the government does not plan to proceed with a second trial of former FTX Chief Executive Sam Bankman-Fried, as widely expected, stating much of the evidence planned for a second trial had already been presented in the first one and could be considered by the court at Bankman-Fried’s March 2024 sentencing (U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:43 pm by Rumpole
And, they tracked her calves to their stalls. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am by John Elwood
Speaking of stasis, both of last week’s relists remain stalled in the antechamber of One First Street, with the Court relisting for a seventh time (since the record arrived) in the Ninth Circuit’s Nevada v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 2:15 pm by Nancy Braman
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a decision in HZNP Medicines LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:28 pm by charley foster
Late last month the 9th Circuit filed an opinion in Bryan v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:15 am by Lisa Stam
   Sex Addiction The employee in question carried out his offending behaviour in a four-stall bathroom, and though he was courteous to the extent that he did not engage in the behaviour if someone was in the stall directly beside him, he was commonly overheard by his co-workers. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:25 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Meanwhile, others have alleged that the PRANDIN use code change is anticompetitive and violates § 2 of the Sherman Act because it stalls generic competition (here, here, and here). [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am by David Super
  That Article V convention proponents have been working intensely on this issue for over a decade and only first floated this idea two years ago – when their efforts in the states stalled – sug­­gests that this is more of an argument of convenience than a serious legal theory. [read post]