Search for: "USA v. Mark White"
Results 101 - 120
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:38 am
The Journal tells us that the White House has approved a force of up to 50 U.S. personnel to “advise and assist” local forces in northeastern Syria, marking the first sustained U.S. ground deployment in the country and "the start of a sharp escalation in the level of U.S. involvement in the fight against Islamic State. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
On the other hand, USA Today tells us that harsh conditions over Syria have led “nearly one-third of Russian attack planes and half of its transport aircraft” to be grounded at any given time. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:04 am
The Magistrate Judge began his analysis of Bendelladj’s motion by explaining what the FBI Agent who obtained the warrant, Special Agent Mark C. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Probably the most far-reaching opinion along these lines is White v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
ObamaKlayman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 819 F. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
The 9th Circuit’s most famous right of publicity case is White v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
Professor John Cross (University of Louisville, USA) pointed out that in the US, unlike in India, the problem was not a lack of privilege protection. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Wells informed us that in Hatim v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
White v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
Ploski’s Afro USA (1971); Marshall Stearns, The Story of Jazz (1970); Chuck Stone, Black Political Power in America; and Joseph R. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Phelps, Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Other expert witnesses are motivated by “white-hat bias. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in FCC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am
Penguin Books USA, Inc., 109 F.3d 1394 (9th Cir. 1997), or the “alternative means” test found in International Olympic Committee v. [read post]
