Search for: "United States Response to the Court's November 20, 2013 Order" Results 101 - 120 of 297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2019, 2:15 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner and Respondent lived together in Japan from September 2013 through May 2018; thereafter, Respondent returned to the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
In response to the initial Brookings report, Sen. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
In the United States, silicosis litigation has been infused with fraud and deception, not by the defendants, but by the litigation industry that creates lawsuits. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
  Such conduct was expected to comply with law and it was left to the state and its domestic legal order to deal with those issues. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  An order was made committing him to prison for 12 months. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
The French Conseil d'Etat ordered the State to pay French Internet Access Provider Bouygues Telecom the sum of €26,100 as compensation for costs it had met under so-called 2009 graduated response system overseen by HADOPI, under which a series of warnings are issued by HADOPI  to infringers using peer-to-peer networks to unlawfully share protected content. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
United States opinion in the United States Court of Claims, a wilful FBAR Penalty case. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
A federal court recently ordered the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Judicial NoticeDefendants request that the Court take judicial notice of documents that were filed in various collection lawsuits filed in King County Superior Court and in litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 11:30 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 "[T]he Court finds that the Government’s request for a final order of forfeiture for the Defendant Bataar Skull should be and is hereby DENIED," wrote U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
November 16, 2018Matrimonial Rules and Forms Revised Effective September 30, 2018By administrative order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts section 202.50(b)(3) of the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court (22 NYCRR § 202.50[b][3]), were amended effective September 30, 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
November 16, 2018Matrimonial Rules and Forms Revised Effective September 30, 2018By administrative order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts section 202.50(b)(3) of the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court (22 NYCRR § 202.50[b][3]), were amended effective September 30, 2018. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
However, after finding in its July 5 ruling that the United States had shown a likelihood of success on its claims against the remaining provisions of A.B. 450, as those provisions apply to private employers, the court also denied California’s bid to dismiss those claims in a July 9 dismissal order. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:00 am by Jesse Tyner Moore
Watkins joins from the Office of the Arizona Attorney General, where he has overseen Arizona’s “regulatory sandbox” fintech initiative, the first of its kind in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 3:07 am by Michael Lowe
Federal criminal law applying to the practice of medicine in the United States is complicated and ever-changing. [read post]