Search for: "United States of America v. Gross" Results 101 - 120 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2016, 7:47 am by Sarah Turberville
Gross: “I would ask that counsel also brief whether our cases that have abandoned the historical understanding of the Eighth Amendment, beginning with Trop [v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Steven Boutwell
Because the accident occurred upon the navigable waterways of the United States, admiralty jurisdiction and general maritime law applied to this case. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Steven Boutwell
Because the accident occurred upon the navigable waterways of the United States, admiralty jurisdiction and general maritime law applied to this case. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Steven Boutwell
Because the accident occurred upon the navigable waterways of the United States, admiralty jurisdiction and general maritime law applied to this case. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:52 am by Joe Consumer
Kessler, professor of law and legal history at Stanford University, “While the [1925 Federal Arbitration Act] was initially envisioned as applying primarily to disputes between commercial equals, since the 1980s, the United States Supreme Court has interpreted it in ways that have facilitated corporate America’s efforts to force consumers and employees into arbitration. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:10 am by Amy Howe
In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks back at last week’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, the UCSD statement on the matter mentions only sidewalks: A series of incidents occurring on college and university campuses across the United States have reflected our nation’s current divisive political climate. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:19 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court asked the Hyders to respond to Chesapeake’s motion for rehearing in Chesapeake v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Delaware’s position as the presumptive home to corporate America provides the state with significant benefits; the corporate fees Delaware garners represent a substantial portion of the state’s revenue. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm by Staley Smith, Quinta Jurecic
The United States has previously insisted that the troops in Iraq are stationed there for advisory roles only. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:43 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court’s judgement was reversed in part and the case was remanded (United States of America ex. rel. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]