Search for: "United States v. Barr" Results 101 - 120 of 567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Barr Labs., Inc., 40 F.3d at 1228 (quoting Hybritech Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am by Lev Sugarman
Rachael Hanna recapped last week’s proceedings in the United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
Leggett & Platt, Inc. the Federal Circuit reversed a grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas for the alleged infringer, Leggett & Platt. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Indiana held two bench trials, one on infringementand one on invalidity. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
§ 541, which provides in blanket terms that “[e]ach United States attorney is subject to removal by the President. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm by Jason Rantanen
United States, 263 U.S. 50 (1923), does not provide any guidance regarding prosecution laches because Woodbridge never received a patent. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Peter Shane
United States—was its last full opinion of the October 2023 Term. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:13 pm by Amy Howe
In a statement, Attorney General William Barr described Francisco as a “principled and persuasive advocate” who “has represented the United States superbly before the Supreme Court for the past three Terms. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:47 am by Rob Robinson
Read the complete Department of Justice announcement at Chinese Military Personnel Charged with Computer Fraud, Economic Espionage and Wire Fraud Criminal Indictment (United States of America v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am by Eric Goldman
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am by Andrew Patterson
The people affected by Attorney General Barr’s decision entered the United States between ports of entry and, while being processed for expedited removal, expressed a fear of persecution in their home country that was found credible by the U.S. [read post]