Search for: "United States v. Commanding General"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm
CAAF has released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:50 pm
Martin v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 2:05 pm
Its lede was: "A military judge has found that top Marine Corps officers were unlawfully influenced by a general's legal adviser when they decided to file criminal charges against a colonel whose troops killed two dozen civilians in the Iraqi city of Haditha in 2005. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Politico is reporting: That 15 personnel were “disciplined” as a result of United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
United States, the seminal case on which the Printz anti-commandeering ruling is itself based, is extremely instructive. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:09 am
Famous as Alabama's "Ten Commandments Judge," Roy Moore is now the official Republican candidate for the United States Senate. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Solicitor General, judge and vice president of the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:54 am
For instance, in a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
United States, 92 U.S. 105 (1876); Tenet v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:09 pm
The issues for Wednesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
Price, 361 U.S. 304, 31 3 (1960 ) United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
City of Chicago a narrow 5-4 plurality held that the “Second Amendment right recognized in Heller” is incorporated to the States as applied to United States citizens. [read post]
