Search for: "United States v. Cox"
Results 101 - 120
of 506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox:As provided by Title 28, Section 508(B) of the United States Code and Title 28, Section 0.132(A) of the Code of Federal Regulations, I have today assumed the duties of Acting Attorney General.In that capacity I am, as instructed by the President, discharging you, effective a [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
*A United States District Court judge granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Matthews had spoken as a public employee and not as a citizen and thus his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.Citing Cox v Warwick Valley Central School District, 654 F3d 267, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that the test it applied in cases in which a plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim requires the plaintiff to establish… [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:36 pm
See R.C.M. 705(c)(1)(B) (“A term or condition in a pretrial agreement shall not be enforced if it deprives the accused of: . . . the complete and effective exercise of post-trial and appellate rights”); see also United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm
” Cox v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 10:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
United States (Sacred Sites; Oak Flat/Chi-chil Bildagoteel) Allegany Capital Enteprises, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Since colonial times, anti-miscegenation laws had existed in British North America and, after the Revolutionary War, in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
., Oxford University Press 2015)).Michael John DeBoer, Legislating Morality Progressively -- The Contraceptive Coverage Mandate, Religious Freedom, and Public Health Policy and Ethics, (Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 28, p. 62, 2015).Doug Coulson, British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
United States”Daniel J. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:42 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:18 am
United States, 2016 U.S. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am
As Mrs Justice Cox made similar points in the December 2009 incarnation of this dispute (British Airways Plc v Unite the Union [2009] EWHC 3541 (QB) (17 December 2009)), saying that she was bound by that decision and could not therefore go behind it in order to declare that the statutory framework ran contrary to the Human Rights Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I provide a brief summary of the United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
United States Congress, 2015 U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:10 pm
United States (January 16; consolidated with Cox v. [read post]
