Search for: "United States v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF I. & N." Results 101 - 120 of 349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2018, 3:21 am by Lee E. Berlik
Ct. 2008) (“Director of Contracting for the Southeast RMC” who had authority to award government contracts and spend funds on behalf of the United States was a public official because “[i]mproper performance of governmental functions that involve significant issues is something that would create a question that the public has a significant interest in”). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but… [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank the authors for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:03 am by Guest Blogger
Lumbermens appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which ultimately affirmed the District Court’s finding of coverage. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
As I discussed in a prior post (here), in its March 2012 decision in the Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Limited v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
"Glik filmed the defendant police officers in the Boston Common, the oldest city park in the United States and the apotheosis of a public forum. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm by Antonin I. Pribetic
Madam Justice Allen notes, [4]         On a standard of “clear and convincing evidence”, the Plaintiffs proved their claim to the satisfaction of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:48 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
The Perry case is widely anticipated to end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  A group of Democratic AGs from 16 states and the District of Columbia filed an unsuccessful motion with the D.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 1744, 1747 (2014) [3] Gene Quinn, House Judiciary Committee Questions PTO Director Lee on Innovation Act, IP Watchdog (Apr. 14, 2015), http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/04/14/judiciary-committee-director-lee-on-innovation-act/id=56813. [4] Hearing: H.R. 9, The “Innovation Act”, United States House of Representatives Judiciary Committee (Apr. 14, 2015, 2:00 PM), http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm/hearings? [read post]