Search for: "United States v. Floyd"
Results 101 - 120
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
They contend that Congress gave the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and National Governing Bodies (NGB)—like USA Cycling—exclusive jurisdiction over eligibility for competitions. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:30 am
The National History Center Webinar, Protest and Civil Unrest in the United States: An Historical Exploration, is up on YouTube. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Quite correctly Floyd LJ states:"I have to remind myself that the circumstances in which we could set to one side the judge's conclusion on an essentially factual issue are very limited". [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
A survey released in 2017, on the 50th anniversary of Loving, found that one in six new marriages in the United States crosses racial or ethnic lines, although the white-black line is crossed less frequently than other lines, such as white-Asian, white-Latinx, or other combinations. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:18 am
"Recognizing a split in the authority from other circuits, the Court joined with the more restrictive Ninth Circuit view stated in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
That the author was born in Rumania and came to the United States at age twelve speaking no English makes Bickel’s verbal felicity all the more remarkable. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Court of Appeal Before Jackson, Lloyd Jones and Floyd LJJ, [2013] EWCA Civ 616 (see here), the Home Secretary argued that the decision made Pham de facto stateless (with nationality but denied the protection which should go with it), but not de jure stateless (without nationality under the laws of any state) and therefore it did not make him stateless within the meaning of section 40(4) of the 1981 Act. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:15 am
”); United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm
Pa. 2008); United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Certiorari-stage documents Petition for certiorari Memorandum for the United States Wetzel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
United States, 11-7650, Bagu v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
United States (1971) and in Branzburg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
United States (1971) and in Branzburg v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Recent media coverage of this trend has tended to characterize such laws as a response to the Black Lives Matter protests that followed the murder of George Floyd in the summer of 2020. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:33 am
This equates to 407 workers injuring their back every day in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
Floyd J referred the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling on whether streaming constituted a "communication to the public". [read post]
