Search for: "United States v. Hatch"
Results 101 - 120
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
Under 49 U.S.C. 1131, the NTSB has authority to investigate: a major marine casualty (except a casualty involving only public vessels) occurring on or under the navigable waters, internal waters, or the territorial sea of the United States as described in Presidential Proclamation No. 5928 of December 27, 1988, or involving a vessel of the United States (as defined in section 2101 (46) [1] of title 46), under regulations prescribed jointly by the Board… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:54 am
§ 271(e)(1) states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff Earlier this week, the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) held that the United States District Court for the District of Delaware clearly erred in its obviousness analysis in Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
HATCH, and Mrs. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 11:37 am
Tabingo based his claim for punitive damage upon the Supreme Court of the United States holding in Atlantic Soundings v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 11:37 am
Tabingo based his claim for punitive damage upon the Supreme Court of the United States holding in Atlantic Soundings v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 am
Arora v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:43 am
Over the past several days, the United States Supreme Court has issued several important decisions that will impact the patent system. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The claim was that Aumtech had a contract to supply software services for Richmond, but that Aumtech India and the Politos “hatched a plan” to sell the software services directly to Richmond’s customers in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
Today the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in this landmark case concerning punitive damages. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
Today the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in this landmark case concerning punitive damages. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
After Teva Pharmaceuticals appealed the dismissal of its declaratory judgment action in District Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has taken a fresh new look at things in light of the Supreme Court's decision in MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
Concluding that LPI had not met its burden, the Maryland District Court then found: "LPI is actively involved with filing Lupin’s ANDAs with the FDA, and marketing and distributing the approved generic drugs in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
Khan v. the United Kingdom). [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:58 am
Nothing in Hatch-Waxman evinces a congressional intent to preempt state law. [read post]
