Search for: "United States v. Intern. Business MacHines" Results 101 - 120 of 360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:05 am by Jamie Williams
Linkedin, LinkedIn tried to analogize the case to United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:15 am
They complement existing OECD standards in areas such as privacy, digital security risk management and responsible business conduct. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
(...)In Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Among other provisions, the new statute adopts rules promulgated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), a U.N. body that has long been concerned with promoting the enforceability of arbitration agreements and electronic contracts in its member countries. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am by Kate Howard
International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Bash, the Chapter 7 Trustee for debtor Ohio Business Machines, Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm by Steve Kalar
It can be in the Ninth, thanks to a very disappointing decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
”[xx] But there’s an internal tension in this description, reflecting a core area of confusion about smart contracts. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:29 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
So you could be left with a state court required to disregard a treaty ratified by the Senate, and thus break an international commitment of the entire nation.The authors of Measure 755 should read Article VI of the United States Constitution. [read post]