Search for: "United States v. Marshall, et al." Results 101 - 120 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am by Joe Mullin
" FireStar, Amphion, and their Foley lawyers worked out a litigation budget of $4.4 million to take the case against Red Hat to trial in Marshall, Texas. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes E. coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body, as well as on the tail, or flagellum,[2] and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:10 am by Anthony Schutz
EPA, et al) that it has the authority under Chemical Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am by Peter Tillers
Faigman, et al., Modern Scientific Evidence: Standards, Statistics, and Research Methods v (2008 student ed.). [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
For its part, the federal government, joined by the six anti-smoking, or public health, groups, is seeking to use the case as a sweeping indictment of smoking as a cultural phenomenon, marshaling all of the data about how many people die or get sick each year from smoking-related illnesses, [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
And this leaves constitutional democracy in the United States with knowledge deficits and democratic deficits in its operation and legitimation – and more vulnerable to anti-democratic and illiberal forces, autocratic threats, and political violence. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by Joe Mullin
  “They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), Chief Justice John Marshall established the United States Supreme Court's power of judicial review. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote almost two hundred years ago in Gibbons v. [read post]