Search for: "United States v. Navarro" Results 101 - 120 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
The thought behind this was that if the parties could not agree which medical professional was going to govern the case then the government would decide, thus cutting down on litigation, ergo costs, and resulting in less dispute.The theory didn't translate into practice and one of the more common complaints I hear as I travel the state is that the QME process a) doesn't work as intended, b) is not timely, c) doesn't have enough physicians who know what they're doing, and… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Some of those remaining are trainers - the agency still conducts training in Corsicana for staff from around the state in conjunction with Navarro Junior College. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 7:30 am by Susan I. Nelson
He has lived in the United States since he was 5 years old and has not been to Mexico since then, he said. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:35 am by The Docket Navigator
"[Plaintiff] argues that a forward-looking money damages award would be insufficient because [defendant] is a foreign company with no assets within the United States. . . . [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to an… [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]