Search for: "United States v. Sosa" Results 101 - 120 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Brandon W. Barnett
In 2002, the United States Supreme Court determined that the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm by John Knox
As in Empagran, the Court may say that even if the claim has a connection with the United States, the connection must be strong enough to make the exercise of jurisdiction not “unreasonable. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
  A finding that the ATS does not "apply" to extraterritorial conduct also seems inconsistent with the Court's own pronouncement in Sosa v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
  The circumstances for this week's Kiobel hearing therefore seems quite different than the context for the Supreme Court's earlier review of the ATS in Sosa v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:35 am by Guest Blogger
After this position was thoroughly repudiated by the Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:10 pm by Marco Simons
After this position was thoroughly repudiated by the Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]