Search for: "United States v. Standard Electric Time Company" Results 101 - 120 of 358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court overturned the physical presence standard established in two earlier cases, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Similar issues are playing out now in the United States, where the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
The employer was the Bethlehem Steel Company, at the Bethlehem Steel Sparrows Point Shipyard. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
After all, “it would be ‘incongruous’ to apply different standards ‘depending on whether [a constitutional] claim was asserted in a state or federal court. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 10:43 am by Christopher Porter, Klara Jordan
NATO’s cyber-defense mandate has evolved over time to update its collective defense commitment under Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty for the era of cyberattacks. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:02 am by Florian Mueller
At the time, there were only a few companies in the industry sharing this view as a matter of policy. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
  The order granting rehearing reads in relevant part: “Real party in interest, Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s petition for rehearing, filed November 7, 2018, is granted on the issue of whether appellants’ CEQA cause of action challenging respondent City of Lafayette’s land-use approval decision was time-barred because appellants failed to serve their mandate petition within 90 days of the date of the challenged decision, as required by… [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:45 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Lafayette (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Real Party in Interest) (2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ___ . [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
The appeals court first took the standard definition of “to inspect” as the statutory meaning. [read post]