Search for: "United States v. Thomas" Results 101 - 120 of 7,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
United States could have dramatic ramifications not just for the tax code but also for the method used to interpret the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm by Mike Gottlieb
United States, which today resolved a decade-old controversy regarding the constitutional distinction between two kinds of sentences: mandatory minimums and statutory maximums. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm by Tom Smith
In an interesting recent article, and a post at Prawfsblawg, legal scholar Mark Kende argues that Justice Clarence Thomas approves of Korematsu v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 1:46 am by Family Law
From Margaret Ryznar, writing for the Huffington Post: In early March, the United States Supreme Court handed down the opinion in its most recent international abduction case, Lozano v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:47 am by brian
Syllabus - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:47 am by brian
Syllabus - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Thomas, the United States Department of Justice has filed a brief defending the constitutionality of the $9250-per-song-file jury verdict, in opposition to Ms. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:24 am by Stina
On January 21, 2010, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled to overturn a century of legal precedent in the case Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm by Liz Kurtz
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
He also expressly joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion analogizing homosexual conduct to bigamy, incest, and prostitution.In both United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:27 am by SOIssues
Supreme Court handed down an opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:57 am
June 25, 2015 On June 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of King, et al. v. [read post]