Search for: "United States v. Weinstein" Results 101 - 120 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by Alex Loomis
On December 28, the Justice Department filed an amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm by Schachtman
Women’s rights groups all over the United States applauded what I did. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
  Nor was he permitted to compare his situation to that of others who had received the discretionary relief he said he would plausibly have also received; that mode of analysis is off the table after United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
U.S. officials stated that they could not confirm Weinstein’s presence in the photographs. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
Kreimer, Nadine Strossen, and James Weinstein, and the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment (and written by my students Jeremy Kauffman, Michael Schwartz, and Samuel Sazer and me): Like Reed v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The assumption of stochastic risk is, as Judge Weinstein recognized in Agent Orange, often the only assumption on which plaintiffs will ever have a basis for claiming individual causation on typical datasets available to support health effects claims. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:21 am by Bill Otis
Lynch, who is the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, to request that she vacate two of Mr. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
 The Nazis invoked cultural arguments, explicitly or implicitly to reject “Jewish” science; religious groups in the United States invoke religious and political considerations to place creationism on an equal or superior footing with evolution; anti-vaccine advocacy groups embrace case reports over rigorous epidemiologic analyses. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Time, Inc., 468 U.S. 641 (1984), this Court struck down a statutory provision that limited photographic reproductions of United States currency, but exempted reproductions “for philatelic, numismatic, educational, historical, or newsworthy purposes to content that was educational or newsworthy. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
  A “home” can be a single family dwelling, a 2-4 family home, a manufactured home, a condo unit,  or a residential coop unit. [read post]