Search for: "United States v. Wiley"
Results 101 - 120
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
In 2013, the Court held, by a 6-3 margin, that the “first sale” doctrine made it lawful for Supap Kirtsaeng to resell foreign-made books of publisher John Wiley & Sons in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:43 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:10 am
In other words, the case deals with the fate of all copies that the U.S. copyright owner made, or licensed to be made, and which happened to have been made anywhere other than in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:52 am
Wiley, 2022-NCCOA-402. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 12:00 am
The United States followed the next day, when President Franklin D. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 4:41 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 22 (Dec. 12, 2006) on the case Nagrampa v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:29 pm
Upon his return to the United States, he associated with the Washington, DC, law firm of Wiley, Rein & Fielding (now Wiley Rein), where his practice focused on patent and appellate litigation.link: http://law.emory.edu/faculty-and-scholarship/faculty-profiles/holbrook-profile.html [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Cir. 2009)International Trade:· United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:29 am
John Wiley & Sons, and Florida v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:11 am
See Wiley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
After settling on a design for a fryer, Global-Tech obtained a patent opinion from its US attorney indicating that the proposed fryer would not infringe any United States patents. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:28 am
Wiley and Sons, Inc., the Supreme Court held 6-3 that the first sale doctrine of Section 109(a) of the Copyright Act trumps a copyright owner’s right under Section 602(a)(1) to bar importation of copies when they were made and sold outside the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am
” The court then distinguished Supreme Court precedents that BG Group had invoked, such as John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:57 am
For example, contrary to President Barack Obama’s histrionic warning in his State of the Union speech, Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:31 pm
The publishers are urging the court to declare that “controlled digital lending is not a defense to copyright infringement” and is unlawful under United States law. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:02 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
Here is Kim’s guest post: This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
That means that §602(a)(1) allows the importation into the United States of a copy of a protected work purchased abroad. [read post]
