Search for: "United States v. Wills" Results 101 - 120 of 5,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
"So the ultimate question is whether the rest of the United States would be willing to kill the secessionists who were attempting to leave. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:34 am
Tenenbaum, the defendant has asked the United States Department of Justice to intervene on his behalf "to save the constitutionality of Section 504(c) by interpreting its damage provision for willful infringement to apply only to commercial infringers. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:07 pm by IPWatchdog
On July 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, with Judge Lourie writing for the majority, affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Packet Intelligence, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:07 pm by IPWatchdog
On July 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, with Judge Lourie writing for the majority, affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Packet Intelligence, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm by Daniel
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released an opinion in the case of Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:24 am by Gene Quinn
Pulse Electronics, Inc., the United States Supreme Court did what much of the patent world expected it would do, which is overrule the Federal Circuit's "unduly rigid" test for the awarding of enhanced damages for willful damages put in place by In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360, 1371 (2007)(en banc). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:47 am by Jillian A. Centanni
After affirming the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, appellant Gore filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, challenging the District Court’s willfulness analysis. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]