Search for: "Vaughn v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 7:20 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Vaughn v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:28 pm
Where testator dies seized of real property in several states the courts of each state may construe the will as to the realty situated in its own state (Matter of Good's Will, 304 N.Y. 110, 116, 106 N.E.2d 36, 39, supra; In re Ellis' Estate, Sur., 139 N.Y.S.2d 640; De Vaughn v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
Supreme Court’s standing ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:27 pm
Among the states that have considered such limitations are Maryland, New Jersey, Minnesota, Massachusetts and Virginia. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
 Trout Point Lodge, Ltd., Vaughn Perret and Charles Leary (collectively, `Trout Point’) seek to enforce a defamation-based default judgment that they obtained against Doug K. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am by Matt Danzer
Judge Newman further challenges Jaffer, reiterating his contention that a Vaughn index is too vague to be useful and stating that this case is primarily about the OLC-DOD memo. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Because the State could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the shackling did not contribute to the verdict - the standard under the US Supreme Court's ruling in Deck v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am by Matt Danzer
In the lower court, Judge Colleen McMahon rejected efforts by the ACLU and Times to unearth even the existence of legal analysis supporting the targeted killing program, upholding the government’s Glomar and “no number, no list” responses in which it respectively refused to confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence of some records to the Times and declined to provide a Vaughn index enumerating other records to the ACLU under FOIA exemptions 1, 3, and 5. [read post]