Search for: "Ward v. Ward" Results 101 - 120 of 2,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2023, 4:06 am by Will Baude
It discusses examples like the "major questions doctrine" and other substantive canons, Erie RR v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:18 pm by Benjamin Goh
But not only that, here’s what you missed from the IPKat last week.Copyright Mr Justice Zacaroli finds manufacturing software copyright infringed and confidence breached in ex-employee fightAnnsley Merelle Ward reported on the English High Court’s decision in PQ Systems Europe v Jeff Aughton and Factroia Ltd. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023  Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:21 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
Specifically, Anastasiia focused on the impact of World War I on the history of camembert, a French cheese.Anna Maria Stein discussed relevant considerations for brand owners filing trade mark applications for environmentally friendly or sustainable goods and services.PatentsHenry P Yang reported on the appellate judgment in Intex v Ericsson 2023:DHC:2243-DB issued by the Delhi High Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
The approach in law is that set out by Lord Steyn in Re S and in respect of the requirement for ‘compelling reasons’ the judgment in A v Ward must be regarded as per incuriam and should not be followed. [read post]