Search for: "Washington v. Wide"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2013, 10:09 am
In Roach v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 12:46 pm
Should the court finally get the opportunity to rule on the merits (having been denied that opportunity twice before), it is widely expected to reach the same conclusion as that reached by the Washington, D.C. district court. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
- U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:26 am
Tweet Tags: hot coffee, Stella LiebeckLiebeck v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 am
In today's Washington Post, Randy Barnett outlines various theories for attacking health care reform if it is passed. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:53 am
Bush White House, sent a wide-ranging request demanding that his entire paper trail be provided to Congress. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:00 pm
In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm
With respect to statistical practice, this Working Paper is at times wide of the mark. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:30 am
On May 6, 2013, I sat down with Steve Kunin and we discussed a wide range of patent issues. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:08 pm
Case below: Laster v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 7:38 am
While the inmate had been transferred to another institution, the challenged policy of allowing religious services only if an outside volunteer is available to lead them is a system-wide policy.In Holtz v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al.… [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al.… [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:11 am
With eight Justices on the bench for the April 18 arguments, Washington v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:30 am
Supreme Court’s ruling last year in Skilling v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
The case is Sherwood Auburn LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
Washington, which we’ll discuss on Wednesday, there were a spate of other decisions as well. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:16 am
" State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Cheung is an attorney licensed to practice law in Washington. [read post]
