Search for: "Whirlpool Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 9:41 am by LEG
The company represented cab drivers during strikes in the 1930s and numerous corporations in the following decades, including Sears, Whirlpool Corp. and Hollinger International (Now Sun-Times Media Group). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:15 pm by Mike McCabe
By way of background, the Complainants in this investigation were Whirlpool Corp., Whirlpool Manufacturing Corp., Whirlpool Patents Co., and Maytag Corp. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 5:15 am by Jon Hyman
Whirlpool Corp., a White employee can bring a lawsuit asserting racial harassment against an African-American co-worker, but only if the employee claiming the harassment was also discriminated against because of his or her race. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
See Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society, [1997] UKHL 28, [1998] 1 All ER 98; see also Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp, 2014 SCC 53 at paragraphs 46–48, [2014] 2 SCR 633 [8] Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc, 2000 SCC 67; Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, 2000 SCC 66, [2000] 2 SCR 1024 [9] Consolboard Inc v MacMillan Bloedel (Sask) Ltd, [1981] 1 SCR 504 at 520 [10] See Whirlpool, supra, at paragraphs… [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
., 2000 SCC 66 and Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm
The outbreak was traced to the whirlpool spa on the vessel and, specifically to its filter, which had been manufactured and distributed by the plaintiff, Pentair, formerly known as Essef Corp. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:03 pm by Scott McKeown
Ex parte Whirlpool Corp., Appeal 2013-008232 (Oct. 30, 2013) (informative, here) This decision on appeal reverses the Examiner’s obviousness rejection, finding that the Patent Owner established a nexus between the claimed invention and its objective evidence of non-obviousness, including industry praise, commercial success, long-felt need, and copying, and that such objective evidence is sufficient to demonstrate non-obviousness of the claimed invention. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
”  Looking ahead to Friday’s Conference at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Timothy Bishop and Joshua Yount argue that two of the class-certification cases on the Conference,  Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:15 am
Whirlpool Corp. (6th Cir. 2/23/09), the same court was faced with another issue concerning the relationships between protected and unprotected employees. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:35 am
March 10th (at South Texas College of Law in Houston) Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
" Gary Community School Corp. and Banneker Elementary School v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:41 am
Local officials sought construction of the road to expedite shipping for Whirlpool Corp., the county's largest employer, alleviate heavy truck traffic downtown and open up land along the route to industrial development. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, former Michigan governor John Engler urges the Court to grant cert. in Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:57 pm by Pierre Bergeron
Whirlpool Corp. and the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]