Search for: "Wood v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
Wood, 157 S.W.2d 146, 148 (Tex. 1941) and Texas Am. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:52 am
Stern v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
Lundberg Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
The decision Taylor v Cass, 122 A.D.2d 885, illustrates another the critical element for an appointing authority to consider when terminating an individual serving a disciplinary probationary period. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
In Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Superior Court (2003) 114 Cal. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Superior Court (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 112, Urshan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:16 pm
Madowitz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
Put differently, "[a] fiduciary relation exists when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other" (AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:42 pm
The Federal Circuit has faced no shortage of criticism in its role as the expert patent court, including frequent Supreme Court reversals and calls for abolition of its exclusive patent jurisdiction (most prominently from Seventh Circuit Chief Judge Diana Wood, though she was far from the first). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
The New York Times profiles Judge Diane Wood, examining her Seventh Circuit record to predict what a Justice Wood would bring to the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 6:07 pm
In Ryan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 7:50 am
According to court records in Brantley v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:52 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 7:02 am
"The case is Kimble v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
The court first agreed, under Holland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
” In his final comments, Spath reiterated that he would abide by any directives coming down from superior courts, but until then would continue with evidence preadmission and other routine matters. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided in Hively v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:25 am
Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
