Search for: "Wright v. Lowe" Results 101 - 120 of 183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
The parties agreed that based on the low volume of relevant documents expected to be produced in discovery by the plaintiffs, “the cost of using predictive coding assistance would likely be outweighed by any practical benefit of its use. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 1:43 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Taxpayers were able to prove reasonable cause for all or some of the failures to file or pay in some cases by arguing health problems (Wright v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”) Getting low-population states—that currently enjoy the fact that they have equal say with more populous states in the Senate—to effectively dilute their share of congressional ownership might be difficult. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
Each development makes it more and more plausible that Judge Wright's referral of Prenda's principals to federal prosecutors will yield a grand jury investigation and, eventually, federal criminal charges. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:30 am by Eric
First, Judge Wright destroyed the Prenda Law enterprise in a sanction-filled opinion. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week’s round up noted that House of Lords backbenchers had moved ‘Leveson amendments’ to be taken at the Report Stage of the Defamation Bill; last week, peers voted in favour of these amendments that would introduce a low-cost arbitration service, by 272 votes to 141, a majority of 131. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  (For instance, if a person were due $150,000 in December 2013 and did not receive the money until April 2015, she would have lost, even in the current low-inflation, low-interest-rate environment, something more than $2,000.) [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy  -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]