Search for: "X Factor Holdings, LLC" Results 101 - 120 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
., In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 80 F. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
A plaintiff doesn’t have to prove how much exposure was due to which brake manufacturer, but they do have to prove that each defendant they intend to hold liable was a substantial factor in causing their injuries. [read post]
14 May 2024, 1:02 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
More people between 5 years and 34 years of age in the United States die in motor vehicle crashes than are killed by any other contributing factors. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  A paralegal working at the insured law firm, Cumberland & Erly, LLC (“C&E”), embezzled $157,268.75 through forging checks. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am by Guangjian Tu
In the unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court explicitly states that: “Accordingly, a court must hold a party to its arbitration contract just as the court would to any other kind. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 8:01 am by Nate Nead
[x] More conservative estimates still predict a bitcoin price of $100,000 by 2022. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry), … [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Further, as a limited-edition art object, the handbag holds value beyond its material components. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
An expert who ignored studies was excluded by the district court, but the Court of Appeals found an abuse of discretion, holding that the sufficiency of an expert’s basis is a question of weight and not admissibility.[13] These rulings elevate form over substance by halting the gatekeeping inquiry at an irrelevant, high level of abstraction, and finding that the challenged expert witness was doing something “sciencey,” which is good enough for government work. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As Eric Goldman explained, the court found blurring based on the six-factor TDRA test. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Iconix Luxembourg Holdings v Dream Pairs Europe [2023] EWHC 706 (Ch) (March 2023)Some of you may recognise the Umbro “double diamond” logo (owned by the claimant) below. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
  To avoid placing such a handicap upon the freedoms of expression, we hold that if the allegedly [tortious] statements would otherwise be constitutionally protected from the present judgment, they do not forfeit that protection because they were published in the form of a paid advertisement.376 U.S. at 266 (citations and quotation marks omitted).That makes sense, since most litigation over pharmaceutical labeling is, at bottom, a fight over science – both sides’ experts… [read post]