Search for: "Zimmer US"
Results 101 - 120
of 585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2016, 3:16 pm
Bought by Zimmer in 2014, now called Zimmer Biomet. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:06 am
Metal on metal hip implants have a high failure rate including those manufactured by Biomet, DePuy, Encore, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, Wright and Zimmer. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 10:03 am
There were no Pinnacle hip clinical trials to see if it even worked, or if it was safe to use. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:44 am
A multitude of lawsuits followed with each major manufacturer (DePuy, Zimmer, Biomet, Wright Medical and Zimmer) paying huge sums to deserving patients. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:12 am
Zimmer, Inc., 136 S. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:15 am
Stryker Corporation was awarded $70 million in lost profits after a jury found that Stryker’s patents were valid and willfully infringed by Zimmer. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Friedman sued Zimmer claiming that Zimmer’s score from the film 12 Years a Slave was taken from his 2004 work entitled To Our Fallen. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:57 am
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:22 am
Zimmer, Inc.), the US Supreme Court adopted a relaxed and more plaintiff-friendly standard for determining whether to award enhanced damages in patent infringement litigation. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
Zimmer, Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Zimmer (Halo). [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 10:08 pm
Kenyon Zimmer is interviewed about his Immigrants against the State: Yiddish and Italian Anarchism in America. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
Zimmer, Inc., et al., No. 14-1520. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:20 am
Moreover, Members of the Court have noted that some "firms use patents . . . primarily [to] obtai[n] licensing fees. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:02 pm
In the second case, the district court enhanced damages against Stryker for its willful infringement of Zimmer’s patents to more than $228 million. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 1:17 pm
In addition, the decisions will ensure that truly bad-faith infringers don’t use a bright-line rule such as objective recklessness as a shield to avoid enhanced damages.Filed under: Litigation, Patents [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:20 am
The Supreme Court found that the standard of the CAFC was too rigid and that trial judges should have more leeway.From WSJ.comIn one, medical-device maker Stryker Corp. convinced a jury that subsidiaries of rival Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. willfully infringed its patents on hand-held devices used to clean wounds. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
Zimmer and Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:50 am
Consumer’s Union found that from 2002 to 2013 hip implant recalls six major manufacturers, Biomet, DePuy, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, Wright and Zimmer. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Zimmer, Inc., 14-1520 (enhanced damages) (linked with Halo) Argued: Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
