Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 1181 - 1200
of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2010, 7:10 pm
If you watch a replay of the speech, you will see that when the President describes Citizens United as "opening the floodgates" of corporate money in politics, the camera pans and Justice Alito clearly says, "No. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:41 pm
The Miller Center of Public Affairs and the Campaign Finance Institute co-hosted a panel recently on Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Today the US Supreme Court hears re-argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:32 pm
No one is complaining and far be it from me to do so, but purely as an (um) academic matter, is there anything improper in the fact that as solicitor general Ted Olson successfully defended McCain-Feingold against constitutional challenge, and now in Citizens United, he's claiming at least part of it is not constitutional? [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 10:04 am
"Seattle becomes first U.S. city to let Uber drivers unionize" https://t.co/36Z9UilQj2 #corpgov— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) December 15, 2015 Citizens United/Hobby Lobby: protecting "elite few wielding corp. power” vs "many more..who work for corps” https://t.co/c2oOGLSnRw #corpgov— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) December 15,... [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
These cases, unlike Citizens United and its ilk, are unanimous, joining liberal and conservative Justices, reflecting a shared skepticism about anticorruption law. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:15 am
Sebelius in Light of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
In Citizens United v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 11:55 am
[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [official website] on Thursday struck down [opinion, PDF] a campaign finance law which bans corporations from making contributions to federal candidates, citing the controversial Supreme Court decision in Citizens United [opinion; JURIST report]. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:44 pm
" And if you missed episode two of the ELB Podcast, it was titled "Floyd Abrams, Citizens United, Free Speech, and the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:50 am
The Minnesota law was being challenged by two non-profit advocacy organizations and a for-profit business which argued the law was in violation of the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court handed down its decision in Citizens United vs. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:20 pm
New York Times: Tax-Exempt Groups Shield Political Gifts of Businesses: Two years after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision opened the door for corporate spending on elections, relatively little money has flowed from company treasuries into “super PACs,” which can accept unlimited contributions but must also disclose donors. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
Rev. 2254 (2011): In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United, nonprofit organizations originally designed to promote social welfare interests have become the latest... [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 7:32 pm
" Politico.com has a report that begins, "The first anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:34 am
DeVoy From the Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 10:40 am
" Themes in this timely article come in the wake of Citizens United and include the ethics, reforms, excesses, and arguments for and against judicial elections. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:22 pm
Here is the abstract: The essay is a critique of the treatment of the freedom of the press clause in the Supreme Court's opinion in Citizens United. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:44 am
Rocket Lawyer, November 15, 2011 by Charley Moore and Eva Arevuo http://legallyeasy.rocketlawyer.com/the-road-to-citizens-united-93874 Echoing Stevens, Berkeley Law professor Jesse Choper, who we spoke to in last week’s podcast, agreed that corporate money was a dangerous injection into the democratic system: “the force of big sums of money is really a very corruptive force in American democracy. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
[JURIST] The US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] held a hearing [materials; video] Wednesday on the effects of the recent Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
