Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am
Wong — deadline for filing claims against the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Second, as discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The safety of the United States suffers as a result. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:02 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
On Saturday afternoon, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unconstitutional the District’s absolute prohibition on the carrying of handguns outside the home for lawful self-defense, in the case of Palmer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
In dissent, Judge Martin concluded that the allegations against Chiquita did “touch and concern” the United States because 1) Chiquita is a US corporation and, in her view, the ATS was intended to create a cause of action for torts committed by Americans outside the United States, and 2) plaintiffs had alleged that Chiquita had committed torts inside the United States by authorizing payments to paramilitary groups in… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:13 am
These employees were hired in the United States; the contract was concluded in the United States; and CACI invoiced the U.S. government in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Americans who were dismayed by the Supreme Court’s end-of-Term decision in Burwell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:47 am
Zurich American Insurance Co., 2014 U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
Since those companies were located outside the United States, the US used criminal prosecutions of their executives, who were then arrested as they happened to set foot in the country, often in transit at US airports. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:59 am
Alternatively, the court stated that the federal government simply could pay for contraceptive coverage with a subsidy (although it is unclear whether that approach would be possible without enabling legislation). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
In 2009, a federal grand jury indicted Stavros M. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
The District Court dismissed their claims, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed in relevant part, concluding that the PAs were state employees within the meaning of Abood v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm
The recent United States Supreme Court decision in Burwell v. [read post]
