Search for: "Brennan v State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
(Lawfare) State of Maryland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:55 am
The Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
For the fairly obvious reason that in each case, the first certiorari question is whether the Court should overrule Grutter v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm
In The New Republic, Alan Wolfe takes on Roth’s book as well as Jason Brennan’s Against Democracy, which “argues for the establishment of an epistocracy, or rule by the wise. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
The cases are: Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:06 am
For example, in J.E.B. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Brennan believed the words represented the requirement of an extremely high wall of separation between church and state. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
It is hard to see how.At least since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1943 ruling in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
He says that as this is asserted as state practice, many will see it as freeing the United States to do what it wants; but he thinks this will lead other states to believe that they’re accountable for their uses of covert force, as the United States says it is. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm
In Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
We don't kill kids (Roper v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:24 am
MacDonald v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am
AFSCME, Knick v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm
Herring Networks v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
GermanyUser v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm
Congressman Luis V. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 11:42 am
In context, though, the irony is telling.* * * * * * *Justice Brennan, dissenting alas, in McCleskey v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:45 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in his dissenting opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
