Search for: "Cooke v. United States"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2021, 8:56 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:56 am
The United States this week attempted to push UNICEF and U.N. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Nowhere else in the United States has a state high court declared that bicyclists are not the intended users of the very paved streets for which their two-wheeling forebearers advocated. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:31 am
In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
He lost, after the majority held that they’re bound by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Babbitt v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm
Again, these are statutory constructions, not constitutional guarantees.As I have documented in God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty, there are thousands of statutory exemptions, or “rights,” in the United States that harm others. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Cook v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 5:29 am
Finally, the right to parent your children and make decisions for your children is a fundamental right per the Supreme Court Of The United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:31 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967); and as the Supreme Court held in Soldal v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 5:00 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 10:28 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 7:23 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[40] What is Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome? [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
BERNARD COOKS, In his individual capacity, RANDY T. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
After setting forth the statutory language applicable to teachers, the letter turns to the United States Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
