Search for: "Doe v. Lee"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 3,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6] Hepatitis A is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) can lead to acute… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
The panel to discuss this weighty topic included the following: Marc Levy, Partner, Seed IP Law Group (moderator) Tom McCarthy, Senior Professor, USF School of Law (author of the “multi-volume pre-eminent treatise on trademark law” called McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition) Lorelei Ritchie, Administrative Trademark Judge, USPTO TTAB Ron Coleman, Partner, Archer & Greiner Makalika Naholowaa, Attorney, Corporate, External, & Legal Affairs, Microsoft Stephen Coates,… [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
Lee, supra, at 259-260; and no “less restrictive means,” see Thomas v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm
Information available at this time does not indicate an ongoing risk of hepatitis A virus infection at Tropical Smoothie Cafes. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Lee v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 12:26 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am
Lee, 304 N.J. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:14 am
Facts: This case (Lee v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
The program does not regulate the non-commercial component, namely use of the trademark. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Lee, No. 16-446 (Eligibility of new use of old manufacture – blackjack game) Post Grant Admin: Automated Creel Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:00 pm
Lee, January 19. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:31 am
Lee, 720 F.3d at 104. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
The following are issues that the Supreme Court will consider in Lee v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:53 am
But what exactly does Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:45 am
Martin Construction Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am
” The Washington Post’s editorial board weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
Lee, 709 N.E.2d 736, 744 (Ind. [read post]
