Search for: "EMPLOYEE DOE 5"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 16,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
International Document Services (Utah, August 5, 2015) (affirming dismissal: Utah Rule of Professional Conduct 1.13(b) does not reflect a clear and substantial public policy prohibiting termination of an at-will employee)*Bird v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
It then notes how employees are favored in disputes with their ex-employees (with whom it does not have a termination agreement). [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 10:56 am
Does the employer have to pay the employee for a release of claims? [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:17 pm
5. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 9:36 am
A governmental entity that sought and received a determination letter recognizing its tax-exempt status under Code §501(c)(3) may relinquish this status pursuant to the procedures described in Rev Proc 2018-5.For purposes of calculating the remuneration upon which the tax is calculated, remuneration does not include certain retirement benefits or certain directors' fees.Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:40 am
In Service Employees International Union v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
The only exception is for religious institutions, which can have indoor events, but with no more than 5 people per 1,000 sq. ft. or 5 percent of maximum occupancy. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:08 pm
The DOL does point out that employers can discipline employees for falsely asking for leave – e.g., in the event the employee does not have children but seeks leave due to school closures. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:30 am
This 1143 subsection does not otherwise restrict educational institutions 1144 from instituting screening protocols consistent with 1145 authoritative or controlling government-issued guidance to 1146 protect public health. 1147 (4) The department may impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 1148 per violation. 1149 (5) This section does not apply to a health care provider 1150 as defined in s. 768.38; a service provider licensed or 1151 … [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:30 am
This 1143 subsection does not otherwise restrict educational institutions 1144 from instituting screening protocols consistent with 1145 authoritative or controlling government-issued guidance to 1146 protect public health. 1147 (4) The department may impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 1148 per violation. 1149 (5) This section does not apply to a health care provider 1150 as defined in s. 768.38; a service provider licensed or 1151 … [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:25 am
The employee's co-workers express doubt that the accident occurred. 5. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
What does it say to people -- attorneys, corporations and employees --- across the country? [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
What does it say to people -- attorneys, corporations and employees --- across the country? [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
What does it say to people -- attorneys, corporations and employees --- across the country? [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Does Rule 206(4)-5 Apply to Private Funds? [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm
(Sasha Volokh) On Friday, I posted the introduction to my latest paper, Prisons, Privatization, and the Elusive Employee-Contractor Distinction. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 11:15 am
The law does not require that, in deciding if an employee had a serious health condition, a court must limit itself only to the evidence received by the employer before that employee was fired. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am
Rule 113(1) EPC requires that communications from the EPO shall be signed by and state the name of the responsible employee. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 3:43 am
LEXIS 80836, at 5-7, n.1. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
It requires a break every of 30 minutes every 5 hours. [read post]
