Search for: "Flood v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2014, 8:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Following the European Court of Justice decision earlier this year in Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja González, Google has had a flood of requests to have webpages deleted from their index. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 5:25 pm by Ryke Longest
A devastating flood on the Republican River in 1935 hastened along state and federal planning to create both flood control and irrigation projects. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
  As stated by the Court: "The doctrine of caveat emptor applies in real estate transactions with respect to defects that are discoverable on reasonable inspection. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm by Taryn Rucinski
 USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:59 am by Derek Black
In contrast, there seems to be major litigation filed in state courts every other day. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
Officer WC injured his back when he slipped and fell while removing police tape that had been used to mark flooding on a municipal street, which flooding had receded before he began the removal. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 12:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
After the Supreme Court’s decision fourteen months ago in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 2:06 pm by Dave
 In R(Winder) v Sandwell MBC, EHRC intervening [2014] EWHC 2617 (Admin), Hickinbottom J rightly struck down the residence requirements on all grounds. [read post]