Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2012, 6:37 pm by Gerard Magliocca
United States (The Treasury Bond Gold Clause case), Chief Justice Hughes was very concerned about admitting that the United States could devalue its sovereign obligations. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:04 am by David Stras
   Second, he states that the Court’s decision in Pearson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an… [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a post by Article 19 Director Thomas Hughes, “Who will protect press freedom now? [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
  The Coleman decision also contains a lengthy discussion of preemption law, but with cites to Stengel, Hughes v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Thomas Merrill
On Tuesday in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]