Search for: "In re I.S." Results 1181 - 1200 of 13,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2019, 8:04 am by Daniel Shaviro
The Oxford International Tax Group, chaired by Michael Devereux, has just posted this chapter of a forthcoming book, entitled (i.e., the chapter) "Residual Profit Allocation by Income. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:28 am by Michigan Estate Planning
Most are clarifications of existing exceptions.The principal change is new sub-paragraph (s) which provides a new exception for residential real property transferred to a relative who is related by blood or affinity to the first degree (i.e., children). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:28 am by Michigan Estate Planning
Most are clarifications of existing exceptions.The principal change is new sub-paragraph (s) which provides a new exception for residential real property transferred to a relative who is related by blood or affinity to the first degree (i.e., children). [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 3:39 am by FHH Law
You’re probably wondering what the chances are that petitions will be filed in more than one circuit. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:33 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Will it be like the wonderful election of 1912, which featured serious constitutional reformers (and the most accomplished defender of the Old Order, i.e., William Howard Taft)? [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:54 am
" This conveys "exactly the message that a trademark is supposed to convey, i.e., that the package contains Trulicity brand goods. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 5:16 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Pre-2008, bank managers would have said it's because they're so incredibly talented. [read post]
5 Mar 2006, 2:15 pm by Jeff
If you’re supposed to be spending a specific time period with your children, there’s nothing wrong with going to the other parent’s home many times to try to pick up your children. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:02 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
Brian Summers, the first Illinois Appellate District other than the Fourth District re-visited the issue of whether the “legitimate business interest” still applied. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:10 am by Ernie Svenson
When you’re starting out, it’s best not to worry about creating processes at all. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 8:21 am by Marina Chafa
  We’re now in the “AD” years, i.e., After Devices, where “social media” and “streaming” devices transmit and receive entertainment platforms- but, increasingly do so for individuals. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:56 pm
The ConCourt assumed jurisdiction on the matter because the appeal raised a “constitutional issue” (i.e. the applicant’s constitutional right to fair hearing as guaranteed by Section 167(3)(b) of the South African Constitution) and “an arguable point of law of general public importance” (i.e. interpretation of section 61 of the South African Patents Act, which not only affected the parties in the dispute but also future patent litigants). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
When you think you’re not going to stick around (or that someone might ask you to leave), you’re not likely to take steps that impact your long term financial health, like putting money in a 401(k) account. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:52 am
So the topic at hand is how do I sell my house (we're assuming the house has gone up in value), buy a new house, and not pay tax? [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
  Well, if you’re a non-confrontational weenie like me, you’ll probably figure you’re out 75 cents and that’s the end of it. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
There’s so many Accutane (Roche) and Fosamax (Merck) cases they’re deemed a mass tort, and there’s a good chance that Propecia (Merck) might end up as one, too. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:16 am by Scott A. McKeown
In the dissent, Judge Dyk explains that where all the original claims are still present in the patent reissue proceeding, the addition of narrower dependent claims is a surrender of nothing (i.e., statute requires surrender of original patent). [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:01 am by PaperStreet Web Design
  If the SSA follows up with an adverse decision (i.e., claim denial), then we are ready and willing to challenge that decision through whatever means necessary. [read post]