Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:46 am by Shea Denning
Yesterday, the Connecticut Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jeremy Wright MP has been appointed as Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport following Matt Hancock’s appointment as Health Secretary. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm by Miriam Baer
 And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm by Rory Little
 The first question can be traced to some sloppy “law of the case” dictum in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm by Ruth Levor
 Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court answered with a unanimous "yes" in United States v Jones, 565 U. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:31 pm
"If for some weird reason the immunity provision doesn't carry the day for the government, I'm not sure DOJ could then try to raise the state secrets argument again a second time," Kerr said. [read post]