Search for: "May v. Mitchell" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 6:43 am
As the court noted: “unless it can be clearly discerned that the information in question constitutes a trade secret, the Court cannot dismiss alternative theories of relief as preempted by the VUTSA,” quoting Stone Castle Fin., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:08 am
If you enjoy a good intellectual tussle with your topic, then this programme on Patent Validity and Infringement, coming up in London on 14 April, may just be for you. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 10:20 am by Jeremy M. Klang
One of our business attorneys at Schober Schober & Mitchell, S.C. would be happy to help. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
The AmeriKat passed out on all of herco-existence agreements...A mammoth decision from Mr Justice Norris plopped on the AmeriKat's desk last week in the long-running awaited trade mark co-existence saga of Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 10382-22 Mitchell v The Sentinel, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication Satisfactory Remedy – 10512-22 Bavister v cornwalllive.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 01732-22 Rahman v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 00627-22 Doe v You (The Mail on Sunday), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach… [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:37 pm by Scott Bomboy
Amendments to it in May 1918, were known as the Sedition Act. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
BBC staff are also told in the new document that disclaimers in Twitter biographies like “my views not the BBC’s” would not give them any defence against posts that may conflict with BBC guidelines. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Because of the public health emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic, the House of Representatives in May 2020 for the first time ever allowed absent members to delegate another member to vote on their behalf. [read post]