Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
City of Cerritos v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
This prong requires an inquiry into whether the party that claimed to have made the retention was objectively reasonable in concluding that a confidential relationship had been created between the party and the consultant. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
City of Berkeley (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 880 Real parties filed for approvals to construct three homes on contiguous parcels in Berkeley hills. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
Home Depot, Inc. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
The instruction sheet directed applicants to submit the agreement either by regular mail or expedited delivery to The Educational Resources Institute, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am
Atkinson, Inc. v Lutin Central Services Co., Inc. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
Hana Bank (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB precedential no. 41: Parties file cross-motions for summary judgment, then opt for TTAB’s ACR procedure to resolve cancellation: Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:58 am
Animation Celection, Inc., 170 Or.App. 702, 13 P.3d 1044, 1047 (2000) (holding causal element of misrepresentation claim requires reliance by the consumer); cf. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:30 am
See City of Hope Nat’l Med. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
The parties to this appeal ask whether the anti-retaliation provisions in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protect a related or associated third party from retaliation under such circumstances. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
” Holding that Delaware law prohibits discovery to assist pleading pre-suit demand, the Lerner Court affirmed dismissal of the complaint. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In other words, a “party will not be permitted to assume a contrary position in another proceeding simply because the party’s interests have changed” (Green Harbour Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ermiger, 128 AD3d 1142, 1144 [3d Dept 2015] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,[2] 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)· K.K. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
City of Huntington, 829 F.3d 388, 391 (5th Cir. 2016)(citing Jimenez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:27 am
City of Atlantic City, 190 N.J. 359, 384 (2007) (holding “‘he who seeks equity must do equity’”) (quoting Ryan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
Heger Realty Corp. (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 698, 707; City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See EduCap, Inc. v Sanchez, No. 01-12-01033-CV (Tex.App. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
We now hold that it cannot.FN7 See Fed.R.Evid. 402. [read post]
