Search for: "Pace v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Bs Thornton pointed out that in 2020, the High Court had ruled (in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) at [111]) that the failure to provide humanist marriages in England and Wales was discriminatory and the Government could not simply “sit on its hands” and do nothing – to which Lord Ponsonby responded, not unreasonably, that “the previous Government chose not to respond to the Law Commission report, and we… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:01 pm by Lisa R. Pruitt
The following post was written by Lauren McIntosh, a third-year law student at Pace University. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Ryan Goodman
” Indeed, Pomerantz may even mean federal crimes, and not the state crimes that the DA’s Office was investigating. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
The Court stated that this should be regarded as an upper limit of non-pecuniary loss in catastrophic cases (later, in In Lindal v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:19 pm
Ottinger, who served as the dean of Pace University Law School from 1994 to 1999 and spent 16 years as a member of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 3:34 pm
Ottinger, who served as the dean of Pace University Law School from 1994 to 1999 and spent 16 years as a member of the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Biometric update had a piece “Pace of EU live biometric surveillance regulation prompts Reclaim Your Face movement”. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]