Search for: "People v. Davis" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Addressing Personal Device Usage in the Workplace – Minneapolis lawyer V. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 2:14 pm by Brian Peterson
Employees suing to recover prevailing wages under the West Virginia Prevailing Wage Act (PWA) may not also recover liquidated damages under the West Virginia Wage Payment and Collection Act (WPCA), the West Virginia Supreme Court ruled in Grim v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am by Andy Wang
” The principle provides an example: As part of a project to identify and prosecute computer criminals, a law enforcement agency considers a proposal to operate a World Wide Web site with information about and computer programs for hacking, links to other hacker sites, and a facility to allow people who access the site to discuss hacking techniques. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Barbara Bavis
Saint- Gérard attributes this theory to American botanist Wade Davis). [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am by Benjamin Bissell
Reports from the region said as many as 75 people were killed in the ensuing conflagration, with many more suffering severe burns. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:41 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
"Florida Supreme Court's Ruling"We further hold that under the circumstances of this case in which there was no warrant, court order, or binding appellate precedent authorizing real time cell site location tracking upon which the officers could have reasonably relied, the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule for “objectively reasonable law enforcement activity” set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Over at the website of the UC Davis Law Review, you can find Gerald Leonard’s Fletcher v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]