Search for: "People v. Shields" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,749
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2014, 9:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Worst of all, the Supreme Court's 2013 decision in McQuiggin v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
What this means for policy makers, business people, and "netizens". [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
So, if your business encounters a similar set of circumstances, Title VII may act as a shield. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by boston
”Americans United filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case, Sherman v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:27 am by Will Newman
This provides an incentive for employees to sue other people who do not benefit from such a shield.This issue arose in a recent case before the state appellate court in Brooklyn. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 10:44 am by Ellen Trachman
A year ago, in February 2024, we saw a major threat to IVF access, when the Alabama Supreme Court issued its ruling in LePage v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:49 pm
Even though a jury of her peers found that she had been unfairly paid at work, in Ledbetter v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:53 pm by Michael Geist
This does not stop people from posting anonymously, unless they do so with the intent to injure or alarm, in which case arguably they should not be shielded from liability merely because they are using the Internet. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:11 pm by David
  I then learned much more through a mentor, colleague, and animal law pioneer, Valerie Stanley, who was on the briefs in the seminal standing decision of Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
services that can profitably pursue this option, they would engage in massive overremovals and giving fewer people access to their publication tools. [read post]