Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 178,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am
Plaintiffs allegations that the Schutzer defendants forged documents tie directly into plaintiff’s allegations concerning extortion, that is, plaintiff alleges that the Schutzer defendants used forged documents to extort plaintiff. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:45 am
Then, at a doctor’s appointment for his mother, the plaintiffs gave the form to his mother’s nurse. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:30 am
The lawsuit specifically cites the guidance on use of workers’ preferred pronouns, requiring employers to allow transgender employees to dress and use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity as conflicting with laws enacted by plaintiffs states. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:30 am
The lawsuit specifically cites the guidance on use of workers’ preferred pronouns, requiring employers to allow transgender employees to dress and use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity as conflicting with laws enacted by plaintiffs states. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:25 am
In this case, the plaintiff’s were the maternal grandparents. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
The plaintiffs, who did not prescribe or use mifepristone, did not show that FDA’s actions caused any concrete injury to them specifically. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
There is no dispute the plaintiffs drive trucks, but do the facts related to either issue weigh against an exclusion under Section 1’s residual clause? [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:11 pm
Ohio’s Efforts to Limit Nuclear Verdicts In 2005, the Ohio General Assembly enacted tort reform by codifying R.C. 2315.18 (B)(2). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:10 pm
Thus, the court allowed plaintiff Derek Mobley’s disparate impact claim to proceed, finding that Mobley’s allegations supported a plausible inference that Workday’s screening algorithms automatically rejected his applications based on protected characteristics rather than his qualifications. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:10 pm
Thus, the court allowed plaintiff Derek Mobley’s disparate impact claim to proceed, finding that Mobley’s allegations supported a plausible inference that Workday’s screening algorithms automatically rejected his applications based on protected characteristics rather than his qualifications. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm
The plaintiff alleged that Shopify secretly collected data on the plaintiff and other California consumers while purchasing apparel from an online California-based retailer. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:43 pm
As part of this investigation, the district court ordered Lori LaPray, the legal owner of plaintiff Backertop Licensing LLC, to appear in person at a hearing in Delaware. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:09 pm
These pre-answer demands are known as “Holt demands” based on the 1992 Georgia Supreme Court decision in S. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 2:24 pm
The plaintiffs in the case sued the defendants for a series of allegedly false representations about the quality of a contractor’s work to trick them into entering two contracts in a residential real estate transaction. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 1:35 pm
What’s more, there is evidence that some are making use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and online bots to file claim after claim when news of a new settlement hits the internet. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:52 am
On the first appeal, the Ninth Circuit disagreed with the trial court and revived the lawsuit for the plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:37 am
On appeal, the natural gas company argued the plaintiffs were required to show the company’s actions were negligent. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:10 am
Affected Models The vehicles purportedly affected by these infotainment issues include: Mazda2 (2016-2022) Mazda3 (2014-2018) Mazda6 (2016-2021) CX-3 (2016-2021) CX-5 (2016-2020) CX-9 (2016-2020) MX-5 (2016-2023) Allegations and Issues The plaintiffs argue that the infotainment defect can cause the head unit to fail to power on or lag significantly when the car’s engine starts or while the vehicle is in motion. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 10:24 am
” It might further state under the “Allegations” section that “Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s hotel does not have a compliant access aisle at the passenger loading zone adjacent to the hotel lobby in violation of Sections 209 and 503 of the 2010 Standards. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 10:17 am
The ball is now back in the athlete-plaintiff’s court, to see whether the economic reality of their athletic endeavors is sufficient to establish that they are employees of either the NCAA or the universities for which they competed. [read post]
