Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 37,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
” Reluctantly, we conclude that such relief is beyond our constitutional power. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 9:56 pm
Of particular note is the part of the court's opinion distinguishing Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
The court of appeals stated that the citizen suit provision would apply if IEEC had violated a term or condition of the permit, or if IEEC had sought to begin building and operating the power plant without obtaining a permit under SCAQMD’s merged Title V/construction permit system. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:43 am
Among other objections, he complains that the Court has put a "choke-hold" on the inherent political power of Iowans. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:55 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
As stated in a previous article, the only entity that intrinsically holds the power of eminent domain is the state. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
Ali United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:14 pm
As well as makes whatever supplications to higher powers that may or may not have transpired.Then, in December, one of the members of the majority, Judge Kozinski, leaves the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:15 am
The justices have now considered 303 Creative v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:09 pm
On Wednesday, January 13, the Supreme Court heard arguments in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 2:18 am
The third case, United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:52 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 1:32 am
Dep’t of State Revenue v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:20 pm
Yesterday, Gibbons v. [read post]