Search for: "STATE v. PATRON" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am by Robert Chang
Providing separate drinking fountains for blacks and whites and relegating black restaurant patrons to take-out windows, with sit-down service reserved for whites, convey clear messages of racial degradation. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm by Alan Friel
When it comes to selective discounts, the California Supreme Court has stated that businesses may offer “reduced rates to all customers on one day each week,” “might offer a discount to any customer who meets a condition which any patron could satisfy,” or might offer “discounts for purchasing commodities in quantity, or for making advance reservations. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm by John Ross
Dissent: This is state tort law, not a federal constitutional case. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]