Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2022, 11:45 am
Drug possession carries severe criminal penalties. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm
United States apply in RICO cases; and (3) whether courts should deliver uniform jury instructions on reasonable doubt and preserve the standard of proof necessary to sustain a criminal conviction. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA and DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, Respondents. 4th District.Criminal law -- Second degree murder -- Evidence -- Sufficiency -- Defendant convicted of second degree murder for the shooting deaths of two victims after the victims and several others had surrounded defendant, defendant and victim began cursing at one another, and one victim struck defendant after being encouraged by second victim -- Evidence warranted conviction for manslaughter but was insufficient to sustain… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
Structural errors include, for instance, violations of the defendant’s right to represent himself, to select his own lawyer, to have court-appointed counsel if indigent, and to have the jury instructed about the reasonable doubt standard. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
Structural errors include, for instance, violations of the defendant’s right to represent himself, to select his own lawyer, to have court-appointed counsel if indigent, and to have the jury instructed about the reasonable doubt standard. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
Structural errors include, for instance, violations of the defendant’s right to represent himself, to select his own lawyer, to have court-appointed counsel if indigent, and to have the jury instructed about the reasonable doubt standard. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Thus, counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a jury instruction on § 230. . . .People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 6:29 am
Even though the defendant has been arrested and charged with felony conduct, these are only allegations and defendant is presumed innocent unless and until she is found guilty in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt by a judge or jury as that is the required standard of proof in a criminal case. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
(Eugene Volokh) The case is State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Diamond, supra.The court goes on to explain that the Fifth Amendment provides that no person `shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
[T]he trial court erred by refusing to give [defendant’s] tendered jury instructions regarding the affirmative defense of the right to bear arms. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
Instead, cases turn on the use of reasonable care. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
So this was a question for a jury to determine. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
It is considered to be a part of the original criminal case, not a separate proceeding. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
Numero uno es a criminal case where defendant appeals convictions for unlawful restraint, unlawful trespass, and obstruction of justice. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
This judicial response was, of course, the standard one before the 1993 Daubert decision, but Justice Blackmun’s opinion kept it alive in frequently quote dicta: “Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:56 am
Given this new technological reality, counsel and judges have adapted jury instructions that include specific charges against blogging or posting online comments about a pending trial. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
The jury convicted the Provenzinos after just fifteen minutes of deliberation. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:53 am
The government argues for a more stringent standard for subpoenas in cases involving the president. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 10:39 am
” Criminal defense attorneys also know how juries are instructed to gauge a defendant’s claim of self-defense and have experience walking clients through the entire judicial process from beginning to end. [read post]
