Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 22,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:50 pm
See Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:22 am
Don’t dispute small sums and if there is any doubt pay and state you will require a refund if the amount deemed is not validly due. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
At Monday's oral argument in Nijhawan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 1:47 pm
We live in one of a handful of states where legislators were increasingly aware of the burden on victims to relitigate duplicative facts in civil cases. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:03 pm
§ 5301 et seq., imposes an unconstitutional burden on the right to travel. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm
[United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
Goodyear v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
Lowrey v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
Lowrey v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm
This burden has been termed “featherweight. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
Coker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:50 am
In a previous post I erroneously stated that the appeal of Canwest Mediaworks Publications v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:05 am
Now, in Yep v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
DiPonzio v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:05 pm
Shearl v Town of Highlands, 762 S.E. 2d 877 (NC App. 9/2/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/? [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The defendants, several members of the state election commission, moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Ziegler investigates the journey from Roe v Wade, the constitutional right to abortion; through to the Hyde Amendment, a United States federal ban on abortion coverage for federally funded healthcare recipients, including women enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid; and the introduction of the undue burden standard from the Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992) United States Supreme Court decision. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
A New York State and Local Retirement System member has only 30 days following the “date of payability” of his or her retirement allowance to change his or her retirement optionBatorksy v New York State Off. of the Comptroller, 2016 NY Slip Op 02698, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentVictor H. [read post]
